Concepts such as dialogue, process, synergy already outline a picture of man that is oriented on the living, on the developing life.

In philosophical or political discussions I didn't find satisfactory clarification to the point in which direction we have to be engaged. Because people braught their different perspectives like opponents (though we always talked about our shared world).

So I learned over the years the orientation of what to me and the others does apparently well.

In therapeutic workshops I have learned that one group - initially fraught with all features of our competitive society - can transform itself quickly, when if honesty, openness (self-manifestation) and sympathy are possible to appeare again or are risked again.

Each individual re-changed into something wonder-ful(l) if he/she dared to act human. At this point the word love  would have to be added (this YES to the Being).

In this way I was able to overcome the widespread skepticism, according to the "realistic" view of the "world full of chasms".

It was important from now on, (self-responsible) to give the world what it lacks. And overcome those claims of being supplied as a profoundly infantile perspective.
 
For a man answers in the responsibility - and in actions he will ensure the future, that generations of parents have prepared for our arrival in life.
 
Today's prescribed (because systemic) consume is really not the consumer profit, but the producers. It divides people into long-term active maker and spectators oriented to supply.
 
Clinical experience however teaches that each division means something UN-Whole, which is permanently obtained.

Important here is a grow up in life-things.